Information on Result #481355

There is no (53, 165, 226)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 6 494349 488109 764898 218149 423513 917554 320986 858446 499177 244722 503079 760871 605809 > 3165

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (53, 166, 226)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction