Information on Result #481355
There is no (53, 165, 226)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 6 494349 488109 764898 218149 423513 917554 320986 858446 499177 244722 503079 760871 605809 > 3165
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (53, 166, 226)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |