Information on Result #481358

There is no (59, 165, 266)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 5 564011 053487 634555 401261 582571 213174 210281 389396 336232 088132 041117 598773 228173 > 3165

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (59, 166, 266)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction