Information on Result #481359
There is no (61, 165, 282)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 5 468808 037737 109758 947061 092016 355176 250757 754925 596126 518279 210503 357215 138441 > 3165
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (61, 166, 282)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |