Information on Result #481423

There is no (88, 166, 789)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 16 165767 809616 063349 734418 205349 949373 307955 645268 174175 425180 073729 007635 873435 > 3166

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (88, 167, 789)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction