Information on Result #481429
There is no (100, 166, 1622)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 16 181614 978826 443459 121224 687778 376091 998956 031245 264085 937199 245758 676328 256621 > 3166
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (100, 167, 1622)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |