Information on Result #481431

There is no (104, 166, 2198)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 16 004937 460044 029821 770528 181372 575690 331344 600483 282650 071675 984204 824943 991529 > 3166

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (104, 167, 2198)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction