Information on Result #481432

There is no (106, 166, 2600)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 15 949753 058730 305799 898984 423738 087510 055022 196905 221668 088762 656266 722116 497009 > 3166

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (106, 167, 2600)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction