Information on Result #481459

There is no (59, 167, 264)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 53 450920 021509 008789 933715 360116 914812 576964 449229 137946 655143 413518 165487 335217 > 3167

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (59, 168, 264)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction