Information on Result #481474

There is no (89, 167, 813)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 49 393183 314904 679575 692986 739512 516122 961605 197080 398185 504157 529231 348687 695611 > 3167

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (89, 168, 813)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction