Information on Result #481495

There is no (131, 167, 100844)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 47 781129 386621 801702 936768 621195 037803 218742 146618 150728 044132 781872 602584 773545 > 3167

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (131, 168, 100844)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction