Information on Result #481496

There is no (133, 167, 174538)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 47 782538 981920 303810 337096 850355 065985 308160 525886 992174 568426 990320 666091 959797 > 3167

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (133, 168, 174538)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction