Information on Result #481508
There is no (54, 168, 230)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 172 325644 107739 975301 878507 548236 621990 401120 429089 965538 112772 637471 833324 416733 > 3168
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (54, 169, 230)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |