Information on Result #481509

There is no (56, 168, 242)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 156 391109 237959 143391 476341 767692 331117 790750 885142 929376 561213 177730 234343 042865 > 3168

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (56, 169, 242)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction