Information on Result #481510
There is no (58, 168, 256)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 170 323088 348461 575979 709829 588714 133952 738594 471325 273502 873684 035332 682982 575105 > 3168
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (58, 169, 256)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |