Information on Result #481512

There is no (62, 168, 286)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 149 426234 475669 377377 496088 110942 198104 846565 300883 465780 878921 022510 253312 083957 > 3168

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (62, 169, 286)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction