Information on Result #481524

There is no (86, 168, 689)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 151 207449 908090 113910 130374 704272 381296 637821 292519 318842 740208 693849 609550 993603 > 3168

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (86, 169, 689)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction