Information on Result #481530

There is no (98, 168, 1323)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 145 769480 661268 930593 642906 127033 487227 790211 352253 342289 827505 411950 330873 620107 > 3168

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (98, 169, 1323)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction