Information on Result #481534

There is no (106, 168, 2362)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 144 680680 476734 419986 042294 981001 794783 387326 868741 607285 849014 173941 678534 520985 > 3168

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (106, 169, 2362)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction