Information on Result #481534
There is no (106, 168, 2362)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 144 680680 476734 419986 042294 981001 794783 387326 868741 607285 849014 173941 678534 520985 > 3168
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (106, 169, 2362)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |