Information on Result #481539

There is no (116, 168, 6361)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 143 853883 623169 068157 915203 860277 217071 199134 657558 415960 565233 968213 561239 329113 > 3168

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (116, 169, 6361)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction