Information on Result #481539
There is no (116, 168, 6361)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 143 853883 623169 068157 915203 860277 217071 199134 657558 415960 565233 968213 561239 329113 > 3168
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (116, 169, 6361)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |