Information on Result #481544

There is no (126, 168, 28453)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 143 397626 872946 036628 229133 155581 419929 570545 985194 957857 839937 647603 920234 782747 > 3168

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (126, 169, 28453)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction