Information on Result #481546

There is no (130, 168, 65588)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 143 372395 560174 059538 712257 838144 132223 467030 253166 451373 053162 564713 143866 737009 > 3168

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (130, 169, 65588)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction