Information on Result #481548

There is no (134, 168, 186191)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 143 348537 328064 693472 479387 895247 706373 223334 714618 219806 706110 265131 739508 223615 > 3168

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (134, 169, 186191)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction