Information on Result #481560

There is no (55, 169, 235)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 475 269327 950223 520861 962515 065671 029726 388255 501657 342085 599295 036670 511488 551335 > 3169

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (55, 170, 235)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction