Information on Result #481562
There is no (59, 169, 262)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 499 899451 724961 048986 163320 991423 533548 816354 190882 153869 356011 862904 567092 178233 > 3169
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (59, 170, 262)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |