Information on Result #481563

There is no (61, 169, 277)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 488 105500 332943 304248 675317 310312 850974 364101 753720 539507 809329 299697 448452 873377 > 3169

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (61, 170, 277)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction