Information on Result #481582

There is no (99, 169, 1366)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 434 434442 912282 767118 306540 408781 712800 222969 529343 934898 863042 498031 687704 500577 > 3169

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (99, 170, 1366)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction