Information on Result #481588

There is no (111, 169, 3492)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 431 036180 161151 815900 013117 771935 403826 532992 620872 935968 783161 778363 816961 655977 > 3169

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (111, 170, 3492)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction