Information on Result #481596

There is no (127, 169, 29982)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 430 120903 380519 002880 452182 666173 485673 342244 351243 529302 675979 513927 435619 016245 > 3169

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (127, 170, 29982)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction