Information on Result #481597

There is no (129, 169, 44644)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 430 060607 532237 388595 769480 368841 361546 739728 173468 955182 308964 711683 229964 430913 > 3169

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (129, 170, 44644)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction