Information on Result #481598

There is no (131, 169, 69493)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 430 082328 079921 687984 317631 464342 209094 531692 103860 507034 444483 404362 966879 141995 > 3169

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (131, 170, 69493)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction