Information on Result #481599

There is no (133, 169, 113939)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 430 033869 466418 047740 684683 370308 527223 073593 341292 186015 223806 966552 669654 103205 > 3169

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (133, 170, 113939)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction