Information on Result #481600

There is no (135, 169, 198622)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 430 050690 406718 544759 574045 551642 831076 392513 633271 623549 610573 063170 707543 370141 > 3169

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (135, 170, 198622)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction