Information on Result #481614

There is no (58, 170, 254)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1514 227690 314610 485870 794172 663366 768989 271334 736394 416455 623653 379954 568447 149873 > 3170

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (58, 171, 254)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction