Information on Result #481616

There is no (62, 170, 283)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1314 293527 045389 049709 359072 247478 528593 425160 290517 522710 557382 224726 517076 181549 > 3170

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (62, 171, 283)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction