Information on Result #481643

There is no (116, 170, 5488)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1292 349558 739138 027069 980056 001677 020513 760726 035538 475709 636015 111052 549922 380737 > 3170

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (116, 171, 5488)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction