Information on Result #481648

There is no (126, 170, 21991)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1290 076958 861295 524947 563094 599658 204740 956198 186209 911859 424426 317018 228733 679717 > 3170

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (126, 171, 21991)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction