Information on Result #481649

There is no (128, 170, 31594)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1290 913264 086461 847802 595223 287351 964036 310965 963697 424623 622429 980802 169871 839117 > 3170

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (128, 171, 31594)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction