Information on Result #481690

There is no (105, 171, 1921)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 3894 974730 902879 623651 521282 192577 473435 401544 226617 618815 841411 159511 564210 399875 > 3171

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (105, 172, 1921)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction