Information on Result #481748

There is no (116, 172, 4791)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 11643 034616 513077 618139 435155 409307 019170 251216 170979 758599 928275 683022 816317 904585 > 3172

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (116, 173, 4791)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction