Information on Result #481753

There is no (126, 172, 17415)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 11623 196899 157899 744265 696520 375484 971865 500164 863295 273284 153959 177692 767488 816499 > 3172

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (126, 173, 17415)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction