Information on Result #481754

There is no (128, 172, 24303)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 11610 648396 676354 477286 752635 447143 275708 075735 750946 559028 494803 925638 971304 433717 > 3172

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (128, 173, 24303)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction