Information on Result #481774

There is no (61, 173, 272)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 38602 074576 453491 868187 723627 677269 245968 419406 267818 685512 615392 629419 867589 899265 > 3173

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (61, 174, 272)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction