Information on Result #481808

There is no (129, 173, 25549)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 34846 032101 626724 957603 540876 458769 639581 303302 895442 511099 262674 236786 916212 852817 > 3173

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (129, 174, 25549)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction