Information on Result #481810

There is no (133, 173, 55619)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 34832 376835 857172 117040 247518 570869 540741 913279 285952 135772 605708 646467 946930 613433 > 3173

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (133, 174, 55619)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction