Information on Result #481825

There is no (56, 174, 238)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 121387 738103 518886 582024 650305 078908 863204 444966 922694 018824 756650 347085 999768 846353 > 3174

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (56, 175, 238)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction