Information on Result #481861

There is no (128, 174, 19163)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 104609 598401 370657 903999 473563 829141 799635 394136 034366 827040 076977 259090 121024 261059 > 3174

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (128, 175, 19163)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction