Information on Result #481861
There is no (128, 174, 19163)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 104609 598401 370657 903999 473563 829141 799635 394136 034366 827040 076977 259090 121024 261059 > 3174
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (128, 175, 19163)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |