Information on Result #481862

There is no (130, 174, 26858)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 104509 758981 117078 281327 869229 810263 771340 895304 349022 598468 205934 575001 226579 553229 > 3174

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (130, 175, 26858)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction