Information on Result #481881

There is no (59, 175, 256)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 349040 679041 346651 002062 015326 613541 969018 470764 182795 670424 799429 940065 012857 501185 > 3175

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (59, 176, 256)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction