Information on Result #481881
There is no (59, 175, 256)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 349040 679041 346651 002062 015326 613541 969018 470764 182795 670424 799429 940065 012857 501185 > 3175
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (59, 176, 256)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |