Information on Result #481882

There is no (61, 175, 270)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 358898 103947 644432 548373 294490 567649 213348 676531 783733 401642 809217 677101 722149 735981 > 3175

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (61, 176, 270)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction