Information on Result #481916

There is no (129, 175, 20101)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 313596 471378 529752 148952 858187 178466 236045 601734 629210 864599 711722 790706 343996 477467 > 3175

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (129, 176, 20101)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction